The table below shows the amount of waste production in millions of tonnes in six different countries over a twenty year period Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and repo

Essay topics:

The table below shows the amount of waste production (in millions of tonnes) in six different countries over a twenty-year period.

Write a report for a university, lecturer describing the information shown below.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

You should write at least 150 words.

The given table provides the comparison of the number of waste production among six different countries which measured in millions of tonnes from 1980 to 2000.

Overall, it is conspicuous that US always hosted the highest rank during 20 years whereas the reverse pattern was occurred in Ireland over these years. Moreover, it can be seen that all countries had experienced the upward trend over 20-year period except Korea.

According to the supplied data in 1980 and 1990, US came at the first country which had the highest number of waste production, with 131 and 151 million of tonnes respectively. Following that was Japan, which produce waste accounted for 28 millions of tonnes and increased by 4 millions of tonnes in 1990 which more than 7 times when compared with Poland. Subsequently, Ireland came at the least countries in the table in 1980, with the given number is 0.6 million of tonnes and not available in 1990.

Moving to the table in 2000, there are an increase the number of waste production in US from 151 in 1990 to 192 in 2000. Next is Japan, which the number had increased from 32 millions of tonnes to 53 million of tonnes after 10-year period. The waste production in Portugal, Poland, Ireland had witnessed the increase in these number after 20-year period. However, there was an decrease in the number of waste production in Korea, which was 31 millions of tonnes in 1990 and fell by 12 millions of tonnes in 2000.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-03-13 quytnee 67 view
2021-12-13 buiminhduc 67 view
2021-12-13 buiminhduc 67 view
Essays by user quytnee :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '28 million'.
Suggestion: 28 million
...apan, which produce waste accounted for 28 millions of tonnes and increased by 4 millions of t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '4 million'.
Suggestion: 4 million
... 28 millions of tonnes and increased by 4 millions of tonnes in 1990 which more than 7 times ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 173, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '32 million'.
Suggestion: 32 million
...an, which the number had increased from 32 millions of tonnes to 53 million of tonnes after 10...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 375, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...fter 20-year period. However, there was an decrease in the number of waste product...
^^
Line 7, column 441, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '31 million'.
Suggestion: 31 million
...of waste production in Korea, which was 31 millions of tonnes in 1990 and fell by 12 millions ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 483, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '12 million'.
Suggestion: 12 million
... millions of tonnes in 1990 and fell by 12 millions of tonnes in 2000.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1200.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48565806176 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.3261176516 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216037922587 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108430492577 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408723561544 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150492849653 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412720810652 0.0819641961636 50% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.