The table compares information about the average salaries of men and women that they earned per week by working in different types of jobs in the year 2015.
Looking at the table, it is immediately apparent that men's weekly salary by working in each job was much higher than that of women in the period shown. Moreover, male and female professionals earned the highest pay.
Male professionals earned the highest salary, at $2000 per week. The average weekly salary of men working in technical jobs was significantly lower, at $1400. The figures for men working in service jobs and administrative/clerical jobs were relatively similar, at $1300 and $1350, respectively. On the other hand, the men who were manual laborers had the lowest pay, at only $1100 per week.
Female professionals had the highest weekly salary, at $1900. The figure for female office workers was considerably lower, at only $1000 per week. On the other hand, the average salary of women working in technical fields, service jobs, and manual professions was under $1000 per week.
- The table and pie chart give information about population in Australia according to different nationalities and areas 89
- The table and pie chart give information about population in Australia according to different nationalities and areas 84
- The bar charts and line graph below show the results of a survey conducted over a three year period to discover what people who live in London think of the city Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wh 74
- The picture below shows the use of renewable energy accounting the total energy from 1971 to 2011 67
- The table and pie chart give information about population in Australia according to different nationalities and areas 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02298850575 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90008450863 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488505747126 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8948464268 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206043148412 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997137953555 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872929852083 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16587845253 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749422169025 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.