The table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling
to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011.
The given table details the proportional change in the number of people who rode bicycles to go to work in different locations within the UK over a period of 10 years from 2001 to 2011.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that over the period as a whole, the majority of the residents from Inner London cycled to work in comparison to the rest of the regions. Also, over time, the number of bicycle riders rose significantly in all the given areas.
According to the given illustration, over a decade, the number of cyclists in Inner London soared dramatically from 43,494 to 106,219 in 2011, resulting in a 144% overall change. The next surge of about 109% was witnessed in Brighton and Hove(3,168 up to 6,635). Although Outer London followed closely to Inner London at the start, with 33,836 cyclists, the same reported a low increment of only 45%(the least among all) by the period end.
Furthermore, Whilst Bristol, Manchester, Newcastle, and Sheffield noticed over 79% change(94%, 83%, 81%, and 80% respectively), by contrast, Cardiff, Gateshead, Exeter, Leeds, and Liverpool ranged between 65% and 48% change only over the entire period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-24 | levanhoan123 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-23 | levanhoan123 | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-11 | kindlebalada | 100 | view |
| 2021-02-13 | Isha Mehra | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-01 | sanjana rani | 73 | view |
- The diagram shows the process of making coffee 59
- The graph below shows tourism statistics among Venezuelan students from 2011 to 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- Some students tend to play computer games rather than do sports Why is this What can be done to tackle the problem 95
- The table below shows the amount of waste production in millions of tonnes in six different countries over a twenty year period 84
- The table below gives information about the employment sectors in which people from three age groups worked 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06701030928 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73668624232 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623711340206 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.9959911102 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.428571429 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185641625037 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780471741163 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0932279554647 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120620132215 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102468101227 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.