The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words
The given line graph details the visitor's proportion to four different places (Aquarium, castle, zoo, and festival) in Edinburgh of Scotland over a period of 30 years from 1980 to 2010.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that Aquarium, castle and festival touched the dipping point by the end of the period except for the zoo, whose popularity witnessed a sharp rise. However, the castle remained at the top and zoo at the least position of the attractions list.
According to the given illustration, in 1980, about 20% of tourists planned aquarium visit, which was double of the zoo visitors. In the next five years, the former point witnessed a surge of 5% as against only 5% for the latter attraction. Following the similar fluctuating trend, both fell back to starting value in 2000. Thereafter, both depicted a contrasting trend, as the zoo noticed a steady spike of 10% while a drop of 12% plummeted the aquarium's visit to just 8%.
On the other hand, the Festival, which stood with the highest number of visitors(30%) in 1980, experienced a significant decline of 5% by the end of 1995, after which it got leveled off at 27%. On the contrary, just 15% of visitors chose the castle as a visiting place in 1980, which further rose dramatically to its peak value at 45% in 1995. After that, a continuous downward trend slipped the value below 30%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-09 | chipchip99 | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | Doan Minh | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | Nguyen051207 | 56 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The table below gives information about the employment sectors in which people from three age groups worked 84
- The table below shows the results of a 25 year study on the use of bicycles in Britain by age and gender 89
- The column graph shows the rate of consumers in three age groups taking healthy food between 2011 and 2016 72
- The bar graph shows the percentage of elderly citizens in three countries in 1980 2000 and 2030 78
- The given figure explains the design of modern landfills for household waste 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he zoo visitors. In the next five years, the former point witnessed a surge of 5%...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, while, except for, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1148.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82352941176 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66223474191 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605042016807 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3763154079 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.8 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112794730222 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437950106162 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473843119148 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0728525347272 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395530234327 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.