In modern times, young adult are spending less time with their families and more time with their friends. Why has this change occurred? Do you think parents should force their children to spend more time at home?
By augmentation and progressing of communities as well as huge changes of life style, one of the matters that parents today are struggling with is about their correct behavior of their offspring. The more their children grow up, the more juveniles gradually drift apart from the family context. During some last decades, psychologists have declared some root causes of this phenomenal. To tackle this problem they expose some notions and discuss about them, one of which is coercion of offspring for being at home. In this essay, we will try to some reasons of issue and whether the mentioned resort feasible to solve this entangled clue.
Psychologists and philosophers unanimously certify that every effect stems from a reason and in this matter, i.e. over time discreteness between parents and young adult, listing some causes. One of which, that is not veil to the public, indubitably is the media, such as TV, radio, newspaper and most gravest of them public media having grown in some years ago. Via them, life style has been experiencing galloping alterations, directly effecting on this family member separation. Other reason relates to the own parents who obdurately persist to adapt themselves with modern society where one of corollaries is isolation and sequestering.
To solve this issue there are some ways, one of them, which is a primary solution, is keeping young adults at home with imperative. The results of a research conducted in UK on more than 2000 families by certifiable university of Columbus and recently published in Magazine of Nature obviously demonstrate that arresting at home and trying to seclude children from public has some pernicious efficacies on their subconscious and subliminal conscious, while their catastrophic results will emerge in impending future.
To recapitulate briefly, while young juveniles are drifting apart over time from warm embrace of family, whether through broadcasts or not inuring own parents to modern life, parents to some extent have to come into terms with this phenomenal. Compelling children to be at home just exacerbates the situation and having detrimental effects and irreparable damages on future life of children.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-06 | Syed Hasib | 61 | view |
2019-09-13 | ata | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of hours per day on average that children spent watching television 85
- In many countries women and men are working full time. It is therefore, logical for women and men to share household works. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The graph shows the number of minutes of three types of phone calls in Australia between 1992-2000.Summaries the information in the charts and make comparisons where appropriate. 100
- The graph shows the monthly expenditure on three types of restaurant food in Australia The plot shows the annual number of restaurant visits for the same types of food between 1965 and 2015 100
- In modern times, young adult are spending less time with their families and more time with their friends. Why has this change occurred? Do you think parents should force their children to spend more time at home? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f communities as well as huge changes of life style, one of the matters that pare...
^^
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'gravest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: gravest
...media, such as TV, radio, newspaper and most gravest of them public media having grown in so...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, if, so, well, while, apart from, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1861.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34770114943 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82296838137 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.7133377667 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.153846154 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7692307692 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69230769231 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277568874618 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956867037008 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631719251727 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17193970768 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387467650035 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.