The provided table illustrates the Harckley Hall earnings and spending on different purposes in the 3 years.
Overall, it can be seen obviously from the table that the figure of income of hiring room, funding from local Council and profit witness a marginal downward trend while that of the others increase moderately throughout the whole time frame.
A quick glance at the table reveals that the funding from local council is slightly slower from 22000 pounds to 21000 pounds while other sources' funding significantly increases 3000 pounds to 27000 pounds eventually. Additionally, the figure of the overall expenditure tends to grow continuously from 56000 pounds to 63000 pounds in the third year. On the contrary, this is a decrease in the figure of profit in three years, started at 27500 pounds and reduces 55100 pounds finally.
Turning to other get of the data, the amount of in income of hiring room has a tendency to decline, about 34000 pounds to 32000 pounds. In contrast, the figures for the income of cafe and total income rise in three-year period from 3500 pounds and 83500 pounds, respectively. And then continue to go up about 500 pound together in the 3-year period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 314, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
...y. And then continue to go up about 500 pound together in the 3-year period.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, then, third, while, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00502512563 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53259352221 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582914572864 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.316268132 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.5 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17642377799 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906643760201 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600722935285 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117941344208 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587275786941 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.