The given line graph illustrates how the elder population percentage in America, Sweden and Japan changed over a sixty-year period starting from 1940 with a forecast to 2040.
Overall, the proportion of elder residents in the three countries was prone to increase steadily. Besides, the rates reported in the USA and Sweden were nearly the same rise while the rate in Japan was dramatically lower at the same time.
Firstly, from 1940 to 1980, the elder population rates in the United States and Sweden both raised from 9% and 7% to 15% and 14% respectively. In the next 40 years, the American elders’ rates merely maintained stability while the Swedish rates continued surging up to 20 and then met a slight decline to 18% in 2020. After that, the two countries’ proportions are predicted to leap up to 23% and 25% in sequence in 2040.
Secondly, coming to Japanese elder population rates, it is obvious that from 1940 to 1980, the rate was decreased from 5% to 3% and remained unchanged until experienced a great jump to 10% in 2020. Surprisingly, the elder population in Japan is assumed to keep soaring to 27% in 2040, much higher compared to others countries. In other words, if there is no change in the near future, the Japanese population will be aged.
- the bar chart shows scores of 3 teams a b nd c over four different seasons summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons were relevant 67
- Nowadays more and more people decide to have children later in their life What are the reasons What are the effects on society and family life 78
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave energy machine and its location Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, while, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80821917808 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68570796091 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598173515982 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7555839727 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109038449611 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511505290405 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372550050218 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0684400865223 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179936298153 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.