The table illustrates the increase in visitors to Ashdown Museum after the refurbishment and the charts provide information on the satisfaction level of the visitors in each of the year before and after the refurbishment.
Overall, it is evident that the museum experienced a substantial growth in the number of visitors following the refurbishment. Furthermore, the charts reveal a notable shift in satisfaction levels, with a significant decrease in dissatisfied visitors and a corresponding increase in those who were very satisfied.
To begin, the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum increased by 18000 in the year after the reconstruction. In the year prior to the refurbishment, most of the people about 40% were dissatisfied with their visit. On the contrary, 30% of the people voted on being satisfied with their visit. In comparison, only 25% people felt extremely about their experience with 10% being very disappointed and 15% being very happy with their visits. And the rest 5% had no response when asked about their experience of the tour to the museum.
On the other hand, most of the visitors (75%) from the year after the renovation was happy with their visit, with 40% being satisfied and 35% being very satisfied. In comparison, only 15% of the people felt disappointed and 5% people had a very dissatisfactory experience. But, the people with no response stayed constant over the years at 5%.
- The table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and year after It was refurbished The charts showed a result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 67
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- The following appeared in a letter from a firm providing investment advice to a client Homes in the northeastern United States where winters are typically cold have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating Last year that region experienced 9 79
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 66
- Nowadays many teenagers have a celebrity who they follow as a role model Some people think this is not a good idea because celebrities often set a bad example Do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1185.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12987012987 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10836377797 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450216450216 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7843316757 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.727272727 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325715124912 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14013014809 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897011254804 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220634934907 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654907171635 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.