The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbised. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant.
The table below shows the amount of visitors to ashdown Museum during the years after and year before it was modernized. After the table there is the chart that show the result of surveys asking people how satisfied they were with their visit thos museu, during the same two period.
It is obviously that the numbers of visitors significantly increased after the refurbishment from 74,000 before the reconstruction to 92, 000 after it had been done. Now lets look at the charts.The year before refurbishment shows a negative pattem: the results of survey illustrate that only15% of visitors were very satisfied and the number of dissatisfied people was 40%. The year after refurbishment illustrates that the number of dissatisfied visitors declined and became 15% on a contary, people who were very satisfied increased to 35%. Comparing the amount of satisfied visitors we can also see an upward trend ( it increased from 30% to 40% after the refurbishment).
To sum up , we can say that all work that has been done to attract new visitors to Ashdown Museum has reached its aim.
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the united kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 78
- Scientist predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Why? Do you think it is a postive or negative development? 78
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbised. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.summar 84
- In many parts of the world there is continous coverage of sports on television.some people believe this discourages the young from taking part in any sport themselves. 61
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summqrise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 276, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'period' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'periods'.
Suggestion: periods
...r visit thos museu, during the same two period. It is obviously that the numbers of...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... been done. Now lets look at the charts.The year before refurbishment shows a negat...
^^^
Line 3, column 618, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...visitors we can also see an upward trend it increased from 30% to 40% after the r...
^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...0% after the refurbishment. To sum up , we can say that all work that has been ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97237569061 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78557881631 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558011049724 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8513323122 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.571428571 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.539690071128 0.215688989381 250% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.252809769625 0.103423049105 244% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.178796761413 0.0843802449381 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.371625034587 0.15604864568 238% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.28602377173 0.0819641961636 349% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.