The table below shows the percentage of mobile phones owners using various mobile features.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is a graph depicting the proportion of mobile phone owners accessing multiple features namely make calls, take photos, send and receive text messages and record audio in Vietnam over a period of 5 years, commencing from the year 2005.
Perceptibly , making phone calls gained traction from all mobile phone users while capturing photos seems not to be fond of everyone.
According to the data, all people used their mobile phone for calling purposes in the 3 years, while this figure shrank slightly by 3% in the year 2010. Texting also became prevalent to most of the users with 82% recorded in the year 2005. However, there was a significant diminution of the users rate of this feature which was only 73% and 68% respectively in 2008 and 2010.
In terms of the remaining features, in spite of swelling from 65% in 2005 to 70% in 2008, taking photos uninterruptedly surged and reached its zenith in the year 2010 with 77% recorded. Meanwhile, the proportion of users utilising the record audio purposes moderated continuously from 78% to 63% during the period of 5 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...encing from the year 2005. Perceptibly , making phone calls gained traction from...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, well, while, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88043478261 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58803224166 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630434782609 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7259227212 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.285714286 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139805009828 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628064954479 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618803149334 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946043225794 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590860554787 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.