The table below shows the percentages ofthe population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011

Essay topics:

The table below shows the percentages ofthe population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011.

The table illustrates the differences in the proportions of bike subscribers living in a town by age groups and different genders in that groups in 2011.

In general, females were more prevalent in riding bicycles than their counterparts across all age groups. In addition, the 2011 year period also witnessed apparent declines in the percentages of bike users relating to age, though a regrowth was seen in the oldest age group.

51. 4% of females aging from 0 to 9 were reported using bike, compared to 50. 3% of males at the same time. Meanwhile, the number of 10-17 aged females cycling accounts for 42. 2% of total women in that town, which was almost two told higher than that of men subscribing bikes.

People aged 18 to 59, however, showed significant decreases in the number of bike subscribers. Particularly, 17. 1% and 11. 3% of females in 18-39 aged bracket and 40-59 aged bracket in that order were bike users, while the figures for males was 9. 7% and 1. 0% respectively. In contrast, the proportion of female dwellers who rode bikes in 2011 was 18. 5%, which was 5. 3% higher than that of male counterparts.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-13 nguyenkhangtriem 78 view
2023-10-13 nguyenkhangtriem view
2023-10-13 nguyenkhangtriem view
2023-10-13 nguyenkhangtriem view
2023-10-13 nguyenkhangtriem 40 view
Essays by user nguyenkhangtriem :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 198, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...et and 40-59 aged bracket in that order were bike users, while the figures for males...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, well, while, in addition, in contrast, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71717171717 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71792261788 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626262626263 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.3928318315 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 66.7142857143 112.824112599 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.1428571429 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.09268292683 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23107135419 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057134222795 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700608095901 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151845813121 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639349213282 0.0819641961636 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.5 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.