Some people think that the governments should care more about the elderly, while others argue that it is better to invest in the young generatiom in terms of education. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
For a nation to thrive, some people contend that younger population should be put more resources in terms of education by the authorities, while their opponents are of the opinion that senior citizens should be cared more. In this essay, I would acknowledge the reasons of the former argument and analyze why the government ought to invest into the educational aspect of the young.
It is understandable why some propose to put more cares to the elderly. The foremost rationale is due to the fact that senior citizens have devoted their young lives to contributing to their nation. Therefore, when they have retired, getting more subsidies is likely to be a form of compensation for their dedications. In contrast, it is apparent that subsidies on the older generations appear not to bring plausible benefits to the nation. Moreover, this also leads to the smaller budgets allocating on other ongoing issues of the nation, thereby hindering nation's paths to the prosperity.
Granted, putting more educational resources into the young generations should be a nation's priority. Firstly, young inhabitants are the future workforce. So, if they are educated sufficiently, they may be a precursor to the thriving economy. Secondly, well - educated descendants are also attributed to ensuring the national security. This is due to the fact that the nation's residents could have higher standard of virtues. And, in that cases, the rate of committing crimes is also likely to declide dramatically.
In conclusion, the pivotal role of the Young residents on the thriving of a nation could be assumed if there are proper investments on educational perspectives conducted by the government. Likewise, caring more about the elderly is still questionable at best.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-11 | nguyenkhangtriem | 73 | view |
- The graph shows the number of oversea visitors to three different areas in an European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people think that it is good for a country s culture to import foreign movies and TV programs Others think that it is better to produce these locally Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Government should make laws about people s nutrition and food choices Others argue that it is their choice Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The graph shows the number of oversea visitors to three different areas in an European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people think that increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the world s environmental problems To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or their dedications. In contrast, it is apparent that subsidies on the older gen...
^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... into the young generations should be a nations priority. Firstly, young inhabitants ar...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, likewise, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30357142857 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98770927419 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3016555989 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213270467328 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698899670809 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693471971506 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150179971639 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808063526672 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.