The table below shows the percentages of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011.
The table compares how many people using a bicycle by age and gender in 2011.
Generally, children under 9 years old used bicycles the most, while middle-aged people were the least likely to ride a bicycle. Besides, women tended to cycle more than men during the period shown.
As can be seen from the table, the 0-9 age group occupied the largest proportion of cyclists, with about 52% for females and just a little less with over 50% for males. However, at 10-17 age the number of girls riding a bicycle was 42%, while the figure for boys halved to around 25% compared to the original.
Regarding the other older groups, only having 17% of the ladies and approximately 10% of the guys from 18 to 39 year old enjoyed this activity. In the 40-59 age gather, it seems that cycling was not very popular, so the figure for both males and females were 8% and 12%, respectively, the lowest in the table. According to the last group (60 and over), the percentage of women cycled accounting for 18% and that of men made up 13%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-13 | nguyenkhangtriem | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-13 | nguyenkhangtriem | view | |
| 2023-10-13 | nguyenkhangtriem | view | |
| 2023-10-13 | nguyenkhangtriem | view | |
| 2023-10-13 | nguyenkhangtriem | 40 | view |
- Solving environmental problems should be the responsibility of one international organisation rather than each national government Do you agree or disagree 78
- Research shows that business meetings discussions and training are happening online nowadays Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in five di erent age groups in the USA between 1850 and 2000 84
- The chart below shows a comparison of di erent kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49462365591 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.290978754 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677419354839 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4056681377 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143771145482 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652427670116 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636511746424 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103643332321 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653002010317 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.