The graph below shows UK air pollutants in millions of tonnes, from three different sources, between 1990 and 2005.
The line chart compares the number of emissions released into the air from three different sources from 1990 to 2005.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that the industrial zones and households discharging pollutants to the environment decreased over the period shown, while the opposite was true for transport. Additionally, the sum number of air pollutants gradually declined year by year.
In 1990, a total of nearly 8 million tonnes of air contaminants were emitted from the three mentioned causes, with the largest figure belonging to the industry, at around 6 million tonnes. 2 million tonnes of pollutants existing were divided equally for transport and households.
Over the fifteen years ensuing, the number of emissions produced by industry experienced a downward trend, so that the remaining amount was only a third of the original. By contrast, the figures for transport and households stayed relatively unchanged during the first nine years. However, in the last six years, the quantity of air contaminants sending to the atmosphere from families fell to a negligible amount, whilst the reverse was true for transport, that increased to approximately 3 million tonnes. Because of decreasing more than increasing, so the whole of pollutants discharged into the air also went down to roughly 5 million tonnes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-03 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
| 2020-03-03 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009.Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The percentage of 3 types of crimes car theft house burglary street robbery in England Wales from 1970 to 2015 70
- The table shows the proportion of female and male aged 15 and aged 75 from 1911 to 2001 in the UK 82
- The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality both actual and target what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve and the number of complaints and passengers 84
- The line graph below gives information about the percentage of women aged 15 64 in employment between 2003 and 2009 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1127.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34123222749 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93480135714 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60663507109 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5647724363 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.222222222 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260903454153 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106847989907 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878070458698 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177306078844 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860091258621 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.