The table below shows the prices of a cup of coffee in 6 cities in Australia in 2010 and 2014
The given table illustrates the difference in the cost per coffee cup considering 6 different areas in Australia between 2010 and 2014.
As can be seen from the table, the price of per coffee cup in Australia witnessed a considerable increase during the 4-year period. Melbourne holds the first position with 20.8% change in the value, followed by Sydney, Perth, Adelaide, Canberra and Brisbane.
Considering the data of Sydney, it is visible that the price per cup of coffee in this city remained the highest among the mentioned city, from $2.8 in 2010, it was then on a sharp increase to $3.17 in 2014, a total 13.2% disparity in cost. At the same time, even though Sydney has the most significant price adjustment, its coffee cup value in 2014 was still lower than that of Sydney, at $2.9 only.
When it comes to coffee expenses in Brisbane and Perth, it is worth noticing that Brisbane’s value per coffee drink was slightly higher than that of Perth in 2010, at $2.25 and $2.1 respectively. After 4 years, surprisingly, residents in these two cities had to pay the same amount of money for coffee on the ground that there was no alteration in the data of Brisbane but a 7.1% growth in Perth’s statistic. At the same period, Canberra and Adelaide had modest rise in theirs cost per cup of coffee, only 6.25% and 6.95% respectively, they coffee cup price are also the least in comparison with the other.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-11 | or | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-15 | uhm.uu | view | |
| 2023-04-10 | anhminhbnvn1 | 100 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | anhminhbnvn1 | view | |
| 2023-04-10 | anhminhbnvn1 | view |
- The maps give information about a university sports court 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate at least five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2002 to 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The maps below show a plan of a city in 1950 and at the present Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football But others think taking part in individual sports is better like swimming Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people think children have the freedom to make mistakes while other people believe that adults should prevent children from making mistakes Discuss both sides and give your opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, still, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1164.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71255060729 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58440432205 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582995951417 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.2043922922 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.5 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.875 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333457486236 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148314148532 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894953014996 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214321257217 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674921481542 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.63 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.