The table below shows the prices of cup of coffee in 6 cities in Australia in 2010 and 2014
Given is the table illustrating data on the changes in the budget for one cup of coffee in six distinctive cities of Australia over a four-year period, between 2010 and 2014, measured in dollars as well as their change in proportion.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that five cities witnessed upward trends, while Brisbane remained steady in the given period.
In 2010, a cup of coffee in Sydney cost $2.25, which accounted for the highest price compared to those other Australian cities. Later, in 2014, $3.17 was the amount of money that people had to pay for one coffee cup, which led to a 13.2% rise in the rate of change in Sydney. Moreover, Melbourne and Perth also increased the price of one coffee cup throughout the years, with a proportion of 20.8% and 7.1% respectively.
Canberra and Adelaide had the same cost-rising trend in one cup, starting from an average of $1.7 in 2010 to about $1.9 in the later year, taking up over a 6% increase in prices. However, the price for one coffee cup in Brisbane did not rise in this period, and remained stable at a cost of $2.25 for one cup of coffee.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-11 | or | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-15 | uhm.uu | view | |
| 2023-04-10 | anhminhbnvn1 | 100 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | anhminhbnvn1 | view | |
| 2023-04-10 | anhminhbnvn1 | view |
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below gives information from the 2008 report about the consumption of energy in the USA with projections from 1980 until 2030 73
- Every year several languages die out Some people think this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages 56
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years 78
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, moreover, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5527638191 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46756694829 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587939698492 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.3651506083 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.428571429 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4285714286 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306557505964 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141033012437 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707366010548 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174376429782 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0896510920039 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.