The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given are the two maps illustrating data on the discrepancies of Grange Park since its first appearance in 1920 and how it looks these days.
Overall, all changes were made to modernize the historical park. The central fountain had been removed to erect the rose garden with four seats around in the middle of the park. The stage for musicians was improved to a bigger amphitheater for concerts. All old seats around the park were demolished to make room for other new facilities.
On the northeast side of Grange Park, a cafe and a brand new children’s play area have been constructed on the ground of the old rose garden and pond for water plants. Glasshouse was also removed for the water feature today. A modern car park was built under the park with the entrance at the same place as the eastern seats before. The two old entrances have remained today.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-28 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-28 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-28 | Wardiati Yusuf | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 67 | view |
- The graph below gives information from the 2008 report about the consumption of energy in the USA with projections from 1980 until 2030 73
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age 73
- The table below shows the prices of cup of coffee in 6 cities in Australia in 2010 and 2014 84
- Every year several languages die out Some people think this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages 56
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two maps illustrating data on the d...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 716.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71052631579 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48788616346 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611842105263 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0754256393 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.5555555556 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8888888889 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174656224968 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732109028752 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393933957313 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117539509967 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0174978426444 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.