The table below shows the projected costings over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects sustainable forestry. The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first years as the projects are set up.
The charts compares the estimated expenditure allocated for three primary projects related to sustainable foresting and the cost breakdown that will be taken into consideration during the establishment of the projects in the first year. As illustrated by the table, the expense used for environmental projects in South-east Asia is likely to witness a noticeable rocket over the next five years compared with the opposite pattern being anticipated in the counterparts. Also of note is that workers’ monthly pay is expected to constitute the largest proportion of the projected expenditure.
In the first year, the expected cost spent for sustainable forestry in Central America is 20 million which roughly doubles the corresponding figure for West Africa (10.5 million). Meanwhile, the top overhead cost in year 1 is forecast to belong to South-east Asia, with 30 million. According to current predictions, both areas West Africa and Central America will expend the smaller amount of money on environmental projects during the following period, observing a notable surge to 3.5 million and 5 million respectively, compared with a consistent growth of 20 million being anticipated as for South-east Asia.
A closer look at the expected expenses in the first year, it is evident that salaries for project participants stand a chance to account for 50%. The other half is classified into three main categories, with the same figure 10% being experienced in the office and training costs, as opposed to a exceeding higher figure being recorded in the set-up costs (30%) in year 1.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-29 | Sanaullah97 | 82 | view |
| 2020-07-17 | nncfai | 61 | view |
| 2020-07-17 | nncfai | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Abbas_one | 79 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | quynhhtrangg2512 | 67 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001 78
- Traffic and accommodation problems are increasing and government should encourage some businesses to move from cities to rural areas. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this policy? 89
- The bar chart shows the results of a survey which asked people the causes of crime 73
- The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'compare'.
Suggestion: compare
The charts compares the estimated expenditure allocated for...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 470, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... being anticipated in the counterparts. Also of note is that workers' monthly p...
^^^^
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ffice and training costs, as opposed to a exceeding higher figure being recorded ...
^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d in the set-up costs 30% in year 1.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, so, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 965.302439024 139% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33864541833 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03267602213 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573705179283 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 283.868780488 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.4064118076 43.030603864 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.5 112.824112599 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.375 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369077709614 0.215688989381 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171927007908 0.103423049105 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105534887047 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26414604456 0.15604864568 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10743090555 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.2329268293 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 40.7170731707 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.