The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999
The table gives information about poverty rates among six types of household in Australia in the year 1999.
It is noticeable that levels of poverty were higher for single people than for couples, and people with children were more likely to be poor than those without. Poverty rates were considerably lower among elderly people.
Overall, 11% of Australians, or 1,837,000 people, were living in poverty in 1999. Aged people were the least likely to be poor, with poverty levels of 6% and 4% for single aged people and aged couples respectively.
Just over one fifth of single parents were living in poverty, whereas only 12% of parents living with a partner were classed as poor. The same pattern can be seen for people with no children: while 19% of single people in this group were living below the poverty line, the figure for couples was much lower, at only 7%. (
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-09 | Mubashir123 | 11 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | farmaniefr@gmail.com | view | |
| 2022-08-14 | Hanabi | 67 | view |
| 2022-08-08 | whencanIpassIELTsbyscore7 | view | |
| 2021-12-01 | Elenochka315 | 78 | view |
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990. 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1950 and 2002 and projections for 2050 75
- The graph below shows consumers average annual expenditure on cell phone national and international fixed line and services in America between 2001 and 2010 The graph below shows consumers average annual expenditure on cell phone national and internationa 63
- The chart shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of air pollutants in 4 cities 2000. 67
- the table below shows the amount of waste production millions of tons in six different countries over the twenty year period Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 726.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27941512966 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586666666667 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5457665321 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.714285714 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153909217221 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916786906503 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630409735723 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115269880904 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557890805922 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.