The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The table gives information about the poverty percentages of type living of different categories in each household in Australia in 1999. Overall, the single parents and the single people without children had higher poverty, while the aged couples without children had less poverty.
According to the table, the total family that lived in poverty had reached almost 1.9 million people. The family type with highest poverty in 1999 was the sole parent, with the proportion of more than one-fifth percent from the total proportion. The second highest poverty was the single person with no children, which had poverty of the level of nineteen percent. Followed by the married couple with children, with more than one-ten percent.
As it can be seen, the lowest poverty was in the aged couple, with only four percent. The single aged people had reached a very small number of poverty, meanwhile the couple without children had reached mere seven percent of poverty in 1999.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the highest'.
Suggestion: with the highest
...ost 1.9 million people. The family type with highest poverty in 1999 was the sole parent, wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14465408805 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32018366617 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540880503145 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4428383189 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.25 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121633007317 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707458479754 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791992093162 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0900793832267 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035682805554 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.