the table below shows the proportion of income adults and children spent on four common categories in the UK in 1998.
The table displays the percentages of revenue adults and children, split by gender, paid out on four different categories in the UK in 1998.
Overall, Adults spent more money on Food whereas Video was the category where they spent less money in 1998. It is important to highlight that both men and women showed the same items preferences but in different percentages. On the other hand, Children showed other results. Electronic equipment was the category with the highest spending proportion while Food showed the least interest by children. In this case, boys paid out more for Electric Equipment and less for Food. Girls spent more on Music and less in Food
According to the data, Men spent 100 times that women spent on videos. Moreover, Women spent around ten times on Food that Men spent on Video. On the other hand, Boys paid out in electronic equipment 40% of their income and Women just 8%. Furthermore, Women used their money in Music by 19% while boys spent 12% on the same item.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-23 | Hector Padilla | 73 | view |
- Student should choose a university major that prepares them for high paying careers To what extend do you agree with this statement 38
- Some people believe it is better to study subjects that have practical applications Others however think it is better to study subjects that are theoretical 56
- test 3 3
- The cost of flying has decreased significantly over the last decade This has made overseas travel much more accessible Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 73
- Altruism 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... while boys spent 12% on the same item.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79069767442 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35231724699 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517441860465 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.2657571755 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291897327302 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113404168463 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939653219189 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217939320853 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0955027989802 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.