The table below shows a survey on the preference of different age groups in a European country on different TV programmes in 2012. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided table chart illustrates about a survey on various television programs which was seen by people of different age categories in European nation in 2012.
It can clearly be seen that according to survey of 2012, 29% individuals of 11-15 age group mostly liked to watch cartoons and 22% sports. There were 1% difference between feature films (18%) and soap opera (17%). Tv dramas were watched by 8% and 6% selected to watch news. Moreover, in the age group from 21 to 25 almost all television programmes were famous among the masses , except cartoons ( only by 4%).
Moving further towards remaining information , the popularity of feature films were more rather than tv dramas in age group of 16 to 30, 23% and 10% respectively. The same percentage of multitudes could be noticed who were saw cartoons and sports with 18%. News channels were being seen by 19% and it was most common as compare as soap opera which was prefered by only 12% .
Overall , it is clear that news programme became more popular with the advancement of age ,while the popularity of cartoons related shows decreased.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... programmes were famous among the masses , except cartoons only by 4%. Movin...
^^
Line 5, column 391, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...amous among the masses , except cartoons only by 4%. Moving further towards ...
^^
Line 9, column 45, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ng further towards remaining information , the popularity of feature films were mo...
^^
Line 9, column 373, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...oap opera which was prefered by only 12% . Overall , it is clear that news pr...
^^
Line 13, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... was prefered by only 12% . Overall , it is clear that news programme became ...
^^
Line 13, column 90, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...more popular with the advancement of age ,while the popularity of cartoons related...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90909090909 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58789196759 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652406417112 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2828395312 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215211619258 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856312474534 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523846082921 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130125271488 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05138054062 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.