The table below shows the worldwide market share of the notebook computer market for manufacturers in the years 2006 and 2007.
The table graph depicts the income from trading of laptop of different corportation in the years 2006 and 2007.
It is clear that, HP companies sold their laptop with the largest number in 2007 other than all companies. The least earning showed from Fujitsu-Siemens companies in 2006 and 2007.
As the graph shows, the income of HP company was the highest through the period at 31.4% in 2006 compared with 34% in 2007. Toshiba and Lenovo had revenue income was similar stood at 6.2% and 6.6% respectively but the income increased to 7.3% for Toshiba in 2007 while the selling decreased for Lenovo in 2007. Afterwards, There was only 16.6% money spent for Dell laptop but expenditure experienced a rise to 20.2% in next year.
According to Acer and Fujitsu-Simens company, despite having little interest among the people to buy notebook the revenue income accounted for about 11.6% and 10.7% respectively not with stand, it decreased surprisingly by 1% for Acer and 2.5% for Fujitsu and Siemens. Lastly, we can see that, Annual income for other companies started at 22.8%, for 2006 and ended up with 19.3% in 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-05 | Theagh | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | cnade95 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | raminghorbanii | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | bhullarb476@gmail.com | 56 | view |
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980 and the 1990s. 78
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015. 73
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002. 73
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in 2007. Toshiba and Lenovo had revenue income was similar stood at 6.2% and 6.6...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, lastly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9417989418 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57604045677 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3410847473 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.75 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203976755189 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997114098921 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418918483613 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134829239709 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232780119088 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.