The given table compares the proportion of 7 notebook computer manufactures in terms of international market share in 2006 and 2007.
Overall, it can be seen that while HP, Dell, Toshiba had an upward trend regarding the consuming product index from 2006 to 2007, the opposite was true for the remaining sectors. Additionally, HP accounted for the biggest portion of purchasing computers in both two examined years.
In 2006, HP manufacture dominated the worldwide computer's map with 31.4%, which was nearly twofold that of the second biggest company, Dell. With relative increases in buying index, two firms mentioned above continued to lead the rank with 34% and 20.2%, respectively. Moreover, the year 2007 witnessed a modest growth regarding computer market share of Toshiba, from 6.2% to 7.3%.
In contrast, the reversed tendency was seen in the data of the remaining manufactures. In 2006, 11.6%, 6.6% and 4.8% market share were achieved by Acer, Lenovo, Fujitsu companies. After 1 year, the figures experienced slight declines, reaching the threshold of 10.7%, 6.25 and 2.3%, respectively. Besides, there was a decrease in the market share of other computer firms to 19.3% in 2007.
- The graph below shows the percentage of part time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think personal happiness is directly related to economic success while others believe this depends on other factors Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 73
- The government is spending a lot of money to discover life on other planets Some people think that government is wasting money and should spend more money addressing the problems of public To what extent do you agree 95
- The maps show changes that took place in Youngsville in New Zealand over a 25 year period from 1980 to 2005 78
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, moreover, regarding, second, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27368421053 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78989073347 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652631578947 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.6165362134 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.2 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276753156974 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113796485839 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101129020979 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188625509984 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0907255367967 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.