The table below the worldwide market share of the notebook computer markets for manufacturers in the year 2006, 2007 and 2014
A glance at the table reveals clear differences in the proportion of the global market share of notebook computers in terms of manufacturing companies in three distinct years.
One noticeable fact highlighted by the figures is that all companies listed, except for Fujitsu, witnessed a slight increase in the market share over the period.
In 2006, HP computers accounted for the largest percentage of market share, at around one-third, nearly doubled the figure for Dell, at 16.6%. Third in terms of prevalence was Samsung computers, with 11.6%. The market share of HP products went up marginally by over 3%, reaching the top of 34.25%, which remained as the market leader. Likewise, a similar trend was observed in the statistic presented by Dell while Samsung’s market share slipped to 10.7 % in 2007, prior to recovering to 14.20%.
Registering at only less than 7% by each, Toshiba and Lenovo computers came as the fourth and fifth rank in 2006. The next nine years saw a moderate increase in these two figures, ending at merely 8%, despite a minor fall of Lenovo’s share in 2007. Additionally, the popularity of Fujitsu notebooks declined by approximately 2%, from 4.8% to 3.1% in 2014. Similarly, unspecific companies were subjected to a marked decrease in their market share, bottoming at 7.11.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-02 | Diem Hang 1612 | 78 | view |
- We can get knowledge from news, but some people think we cannot trust the journalist. What do you think? What qualities do you think a successful journalist should have? 89
- Somepeoplethinksecondaryschoolstudentsshouldlearninternationalnewsasoneoftheirsubjects,whileothersbelievethatthisisawasteofvaluabletime.Discussbothviewsandgiveyourownopinion 11
- Trying to save endangered animal species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources.Do you agree or disagree? 89
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 61
- The graph below shows a survey result of 4000 participants who expressed what important aspects they have learned from the internship they have completed 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, similarly, third, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1103.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15420560748 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89356908034 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64953271028 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.3 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389243218125 0.215688989381 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132519268107 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730643974779 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21908708994 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536220905083 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.