In the modern world, mobile and smartphone use has become universal in most parts of the world. Although there are clearly many advantages of this technology, there are many who believe it also brings many disadvantages. Discuss both points of view and give your opinion
In this day and age, it is undeniable that technology has become ubiquitous across the globe. And, whether it brings more harm than good is a debatable issue. Personally, I believe that its demerits are, by far, more significant.
On the one hand, there is little room for doubt that the technological innovations such as mobile and smart phone have brought great benefits to our daily lives. First, it is obvious that this technology has facilitated communication to be considerably easier and more convenient. If sending a message, used to take many hours or even days to reach recipients due to vast distances, now thanks to smartphones, it is completed in less than a blink of eyes, as a result, it serves as an instant tool for modern people to keep in contact with friends or family. More importantly, these portable devices can enable us to be well-informed of up-to-minute what is happening in the world. For example, thanks to thousands of online newspaper apps, someone can catch up the latest news about a terrorist attack in the Eastern Centre immediately whilst he is commuting to work. Thus, cell phones is truly playing an indispensable part as a huge source of information.
On the other hand, despite those unquestionable advantages of this technology, I would argue that its drawbacks should not be underestimated. The fact that these so-called useful devices give rise to an unexpected sedentary lifestyle is becoming alarming. Children who are exposed to smartphone since their early age may suffer from technological addiction in which they are prone to stick to screen for long hours and neglect outdoor activities. Another threat is that people are more likely to base their lives around smartphones, consequently, they immerse themselves in virtual space and ignore the importance face-to-face interaction. In fact, it is not impossible to notice the usual image of people who are walking on the street or having meals but constantly surfing their phones.
In conclusion, it is my belief that the disadvantages of smart phone should be taken into careful consideration before a technology-dependent generation is expected.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-20 | alifdores | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-08 | Diem Hang 1612 | 89 | view |
- The figure below is a town planning map Showing the likely position of new shopping centers as well as the various different zones and major transportation route of the town Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c 80
- Somepeoplethinksecondaryschoolstudentsshouldlearninternationalnewsasoneoftheirsubjects,whileothersbelievethatthisisawasteofvaluabletime.Discussbothviewsandgiveyourownopinion 11
- We can get knowledge from news, but some people think we cannot trust the journalist. What do you think? What qualities do you think a successful journalist should have? 89
- In modern societies, it is possible for people to go shopping, work andcommunicate via the internet without face-to-face communication. Is it a positive or negative development? 89
- Some people hold that we should spend amount of time and money on the protection of wild animals Some people argue that they should be spent on human populations To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, may, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16618911175 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14994732126 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650429799427 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2751836068 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.2 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119255440137 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0328559301333 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0236457829664 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0558674936961 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328428834463 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.