The table illustrates the expenditure on five different items of Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey in 2002.
Overall, it is noteworthy that five European countries paid most of their money for food, drinks and tobacco, while the lowest spending can be seen in the category of outdoor activities and education. Additionally, the outlay of Turkey was generally the highest among all.
In terms of food, drinks and tobacco, people in Turkey spent the most at 32.14%, followed by Ireland with 28.91%. Meanwhile, the spending on food in the remaining countries in the given table was under 20%, with Sweden ending at 15.77%, which was the lowest. Turning to clothing and footwear, 9% of Italian expenditure was composed of this item whereas around 6% of other countries’ outgoing was on clothes and Sweden spent the least at 5.40%.
Regarding leisure and education, this was the smallest proportion in all five different countries, with figures ending at under 5%. The outlay of Turkey accounted for 4.35%, topping other countries. In contrast, the lowest expenditure on these goods was in Spain, which constituted 1.98%
- Some people believe that teenagers should concentrate on all school subjects But others believe that teenagers should focus on the subjects that they are good at or that they find the most interest Discuss both sides and give your opinion 78
- The table blow gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 78
- The map shows the development of Meadowside village and Fonton over three different time periods 1962 1985 and present Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some psychologists recommended that to overcome stress in daily life we should do nothing at all for a period of time in a day Do you agree or disagree 67
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24175824176 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66546384337 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4197153425 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166435594396 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716044292431 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903294216377 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129929749321 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0959000663147 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.