The table compares the numbers of school dropouts in the years 1990, 2000 and 2010 in an unspecified school.
The given table depicts the improvement in the drop-out issue in an unspecified school in three separate years of 1990, 2000 and 2010.
Overall, the higher the grades, the more tremendous the quantity of students leaving school. Furthermore, a significant fall in the number of dropouts was witnessed in all grades from 8 to 12 during the studied period.
The most enormous number of dropouts was recorded in the year 1990. The figure for grade 8 was the smallest. Meanwhile, those for other grades were dramatically higher with 190 and 196 students of grade 11 and 12 respectively, leaving school.
However, after the next two decades, the situation was positively improved. There was no grade 8 student dropping out and only one case of grade 9 was identified. Although the statistics remained pretty high for other levels, they noticeably submersed. The quantity of grade 11 and 12 drop-out students plummeted by approximately two third to 65 cases each.
- The chart gives information about the amount of oil discovered worldwide from 1950 to 2020 69
- the graph below campares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. 78
- the line graph below shows the changes in the share price of Outokumpu company in euros between January 2006 and December 2010. 84
- the bar chart below shows the three min causes of land damage in four different areas in the world. 78
- The table compares the numbers of school dropouts in the years 1990 2000 and 2010 in an unspecified school 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 97, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'student' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'students'.
Suggestion: students
...sitively improved. There was no grade 8 student dropping out and only one case of grade...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 803.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08227848101 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83813304812 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620253164557 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7723825916 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.3 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226829516615 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930318045711 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138400147438 0.0843802449381 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18353419256 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.163860885239 0.0819641961636 200% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.