The table compares the percentage of mobile phone owners using their phone features from 2006 to 2010.
The table reveals changes in the rate of mobile phone users using phone’s functions in three separate years, 2006, 2008, and 2010. Overall, all categories except for “make calls” showed an increase, and making calls was the most popular feature during these years surveyed.
Regarding the figure for making calls, although possessing the highest position, this value decreased by 1% from 100% in the first year to 99% in the last year. The second and the third most popular feature belonged to the category of “send and receive text messages” and “take photos”, peaking at 79% and 76% after a 4-year-period respectively. Noticeably, despite being not available until 2008, the rate of users searching the Internet and recording video witnessed a significant change. To be exact, the percentage of people using the Internet for searching increase dramatically by 32% to 73% while that of record video rose by 26% to a peak of 35% in 2010. Following an upward trend, the figure for playing games and playing music increased significantly, in which the proportion doubled to 41% for the former and 26% for the latter respectively in the end.
- Nowadays more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face is this a positive or negative development 89
- The charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed employed or further education in 1980 1990 and 2000 89
- Nowadays more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face is this a positive or negative development 84
- Healthcare should not be provided for free regardless of a person s income The health of an individual is in their own hands To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, third, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 967.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1164021164 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73937168315 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645502645503 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 23.5787867303 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 138.142857143 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171661860125 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804254145631 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126193837582 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161124645988 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101020135006 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.