The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005.
The line graph gives information about how many people in different regions of the world travelled abroad during the period of 16 years from 1990 to 2005.
Overall, there was a remarkable increase in the number of overseas travellers throughout the years. Besides, there was a significant drop in America while the figures for the other areas witnessed a reverse trend.
There was a total of 448.9 million in 1990, which then saw an upward trend to 693.7 million in the following 15 years. Starting at 18.2 million people, the number of African people visiting another country rose slightly to 28.7 million in 2005, followed by Middle West, with the increase of 6 million. In comparison, Europe was ranked second in the first year, at 280.2 million which climbed sharply to over 400 million in 2005. The figure for Asia and the Pacific in 2005 (135.8 million) was more than twice as high as that of 1990 (60.2 million).
Regarding America where 680.5 million people travelled abroad in 1990. However, its figure experienced a sudden fall to end at only 113.2 million.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- SOME PEOPLE THINK THAT THE BEST WAY TO REDUCE CRIME IS TO GIVE LONGER PRISON SENTENCES OTHERS HOWEVER BELIEVE THERE ARE BETTER ALTERNATIVE WAYS OF REDUCING CRIME DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OPINION 89
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015
- The chart below shows the percentage of people of different age groups who went to cinema once a month or more in one European country from 2000 to 2011 91
- The graph shows the sales of six essential products on Webuy in the first half of 2020 48
- The two maps compare the changes of a school campus from 1985 to 2012 47
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8956043956 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38553306898 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631868131868 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3214793737 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143310393304 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070410312916 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527429494485 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0972917593647 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300283127569 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.