The table give information on customer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
The table compares five distinct nations in term of 3 types of customer expenses in the year 2002.
It is clear that in all described countries, customers spent the most for food, drink and tobacco. On the other hand, leisure and education was the item receiving the least expense.
As can be seen from the table, in Turkey, the proportions of user expenditure in two type of demand - food, drink, tobacco and leisure/education were in the top of 5 compared countries, at 32.14% and 4.35% respectively. Ireland followed in term of food, drink and tobacco with 28.91%, approximately 13 time higher than spending for leisure and education.
It can be seen that Sweden has the lowest percentages of national customer spending for both food/drink/tobacco at 15.77%, and clothing / footwear, at just over 5%. On the contrary, Italy was the country having the highest percentage in clothing/ footwear, raeching 9%. In spite of higher figures in these items, Spain had the lowest figure for leisure and education, at nearly 2%.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-04-30 | Ahmad_off | 84 | view |
2023-08-07 | .zin@ | 78 | view |
2023-06-25 | MiaMia_8786 | 56 | view |
2023-04-18 | minthu vũ | view | |
2023-04-13 | anhminhbnvn1 | 84 | view |
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sport center now and how it will look after redevelopment 67
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 67
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The pictures describe the transformation of the waterfront area of Darwin town during a 5 year period starting from 2009 78
- Road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
in spite of, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04733727811 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96926333333 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644970414201 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3814523111 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.625 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108978070645 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547239983774 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598412139056 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0866358226982 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694218413092 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.