The table illustrates the nature of national consumer expenditure in Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey on three categories of consumer product in 2002.
Overall, it can be observed that spending on food, drinks and tobacco is highest in all five countries. On the other hand, leisure and education has lowest portion of total expenditure.
The highest portion of expenditure on food, drinks and tobacco is in Turkey (32.14%) followed by Ireland (28.91%), Spain (18.80%), Italy (16.36%) and Sweden (15.77%) respectively.
Similarly, Italy spent more on clothing and footwear i.e. 9 % in comparison to other four countries. Only 5.40 % spend on clothing and footwear by Sweden, whereas, Ireland spent 4.35 %, on leisure and education, which is highest portion of expenditure among these five countries. The lowest amount of money spends in these items by Spain i.e. 1.98 %. However, the expenditure on these items by Italy (3.20%) , Ireland (2.21 %) and Sweden (3.22%) respectively.
- The chart bellow shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 67
- The given trend line explains consumption of fish and different kind of meet items in a Europian country from 1979 to 2004. 73
- The given trend line explains consumption of fish and different kind of meet items in a Europian country from 1979 to 2004. 73
- An informal letter 89
- The table illustrates the nature of national consumer expenditure in Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey on three categories of consumer product in 2002. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'has the lowest'.
Suggestion: has the lowest
...n the other hand, leisure and education has lowest portion of total expenditure. The hig...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the highest'.
Suggestion: is the highest
...4.35 %, on leisure and education, which is highest portion of expenditure among these five...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 406, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...xpenditure on these items by Italy 3.20% , Ireland 2.21 % and Sweden 3.22% respect...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, similarly, so, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 686.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 128.0 196.424390244 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.359375 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.36358566101 3.73543355544 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74776889587 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 194.4 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.9201170374 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123338334369 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562658828934 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561774836664 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0828812493358 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603085260196 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.