he chart bellow shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.
The diagram presents data about fluctuation in average price of house in major five cities of world from 1990 to 2002 in comparison to average changing price of 1989.
Overall, it can be observed that New York, Tokyo, and London real estate price was declined in between 1990 to 1995. On the other hand Madrid and Frankfurt house price increased. However, from 1996 to 2002 on an average price was increased except London.
The price of house in New York City was declined by 5 percent in first five year from 1990 to 1995 and start to increase by 5 percentages in a second five years i.e. 1996 to 2002 in comparison to average change in price of house in 1989. Madrid city house price was in increasing trend at a slow rate. Similarly, the average price of house in Tokyo was rapidly decreasing in first five year. And it started increased at slow rate in second five year of observation.
However, Frankfurt city's real estate price has been increasing at a slow rate in comparison to 1989. On the other hand, price changing rate of house in London is very fluctuating where in a first five year it was decreasing in a high rate but in the second phase of observation it grow at a high rate almost 12 percentage in 2002 with compared of change in price of house in 1989.
- The chart bellow shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 67
- Task 1General training test 11
- The table illustrates the nature of national consumer expenditure in Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey on three categories of consumer product in 2002. 56
- The table illustrates the nature of national consumer expenditure in Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey on three categories of consumer product in 2002. 61
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rage price was increased except London. The price of house in New York City was ...
^^^
Line 4, column 282, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'grows'?
Suggestion: grows
...t in the second phase of observation it grow at a high rate almost 12 percentage in ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, similarly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 33.7804878049 172% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48068669528 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4350616662 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.420600858369 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.8552674829 43.030603864 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.4 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.44745277559 0.215688989381 207% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.216648923715 0.103423049105 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130239628879 0.0843802449381 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.336020418025 0.15604864568 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100063562696 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.