The table illustrates the nature of national consumer expenditure in Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey on three categories of consumer product in 2002.
The table illustrates the nature of national consumer expenditure in Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey on three categories of consumer product in 2002.
Overall, it can be observed that spending on food, drinks and tobacco is highest in all five countries. On the other hand, leisure and education has lowest portion of total expenditure.
The highest portion of expenditure on food, drinks and tobacco is in Turkey (32.14%) followed by Ireland (28.91%), Spain (18.80%), Italy (16.36%) and Sweden (15.77%) respectively.
Similarly, Italy spent more on clothing and footwear i.e. 9 % in comparison to other four countries. Only 5.40 % spend on clothing and footwear by Sweden, whereas, Ireland spent 4.35 %, on leisure and education, which is highest portion of expenditure among these five countries. The lowest amount of money spends in these items by Spain i.e. 1.98 %. However, the expenditure on these items by Italy (3.20%) , Ireland (2.21 %) and Sweden (3.22%) respectively.
- The given trend line explains consumption of fish and different kind of meet items in a Europian country from 1979 to 2004. 73
- he chart bellow shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 67
- The given trend line explains consumption of fish and different kind of meet items in a Europian country from 1979 to 2004. 73
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 67
- An informal letter 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'has the lowest'.
Suggestion: has the lowest
...n the other hand, leisure and education has lowest portion of total expenditure. The hig...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 219, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the highest'.
Suggestion: is the highest
...4.35 %, on leisure and education, which is highest portion of expenditure among these five...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 406, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...xpenditure on these items by Italy 3.20% , Ireland 2.21 % and Sweden 3.22% respect...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, similarly, so, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 819.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38815789474 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76530134412 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1198079622 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.375 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377669733804 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174232647532 0.103423049105 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.316503592202 0.0843802449381 375% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312160937002 0.15604864568 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.400543835631 0.0819641961636 489% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.