The table illustrates which consequences can be caused by deforestation.
The table illustrates which consequences can be caused by deforestation.
From an overall perspective, it is apparent that clear cutting of forest leads to four main consequences, that could be grouped into two lines with having as a result flooding and reduction of biodiversity.
The first line has one initial stage and one final. It starts when heavy logging equipment compresses the soil, then damages go through two steps and finish with flooding. So it is clear only equipment for wood leads to flooding.
The second group which ends with biodiversity reduction have three different reasons for causing this damage. The shrank of flora and fauna could be caused after clear cutting of forests because it has three consequences: fewer roots hold the top soil in, increased risk of burning, plants returns less moisture to air. So this reasons have different number of steppes but eventually all of them finish with less biodiversity.
- The table illustrates which consequences can be caused by deforestation 61
- The charts show the distribution of money spent on music in three different years in Northern Ireland 70
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 78
- More and more people claim that modern work patterns are a source of stress What do you think are the causes of this Can you suggest some possible solutions 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, then, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 790.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16339869281 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78257947156 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679738562092 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.607372575 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.75 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207763645073 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124391602195 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.250496220902 0.0843802449381 297% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228370346123 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.320242111992 0.0819641961636 391% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.