The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010

The given chart demonstrates how much money three countries allocated to some developing ones in 4-year period, starting from 2006.
It is obvious that, all of three mentioned countries had a increase in their funding and the total money spending for developing countries from 2006 to 2010. In the year 2010, The US outstripped in the funding for a number of developing countries.
In the period of 4 year, starting from 2006, there was always a steady growth in the USA government’s funds until 2010 of more than 10% in the money which developing countries were received from the USA. and the massive percentage witnessed is in the last year in the mentioned period, occupied 20,3% total of funding in the mentioned countries, followed by EU and the other countries which has funds to help a coupled of countries, with numbers which was not higher than the USA, at just approximately 3% in 2006 and about 4% in the year 2010.
A 4-year mentioned period witnessed a upward trend in the money of the government in three area: USA, EU and the other countries allocating for some developing countries, just over 15% in 2006, but there was a noticeable change in this funding in 4 years later, with 28.1%

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... countries allocated to some developing ones in 4-year period, starting from 2006. ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 58, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...t, all of three mentioned countries had a increase in their funding and the total...
^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...g countries were received from the USA. and the massive percentage witnessed is in ...
^^^
Line 4, column 37, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
.... A 4-year mentioned period witnessed a upward trend in the money of the govern...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77990430622 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70215919945 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497607655502 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.375640554 43.030603864 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.5 112.824112599 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.8333333333 22.9334400587 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.16666666667 5.23603664747 22% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309204897421 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195555847668 0.103423049105 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624777712956 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227321711134 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487201411346 0.0819641961636 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.2329268293 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.35 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.04 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.