The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010.20062007200820092010The US9.710.513.51822.7EU countries3.33.43.83.74.0Other countries2.72.93.12.63.3Tot

Essay topics:

The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010.
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
The US 9.7 10.5 13.5 18 22.7
EU countries 3.3 3.4 3.8 3.7 4.0
Other countries 2.7 2.9 3.1 2.6 3.3
Total 15.7 16.8 20.4 24.3 30
(billions of US dollars)

The table given reveals the figures for the financial aid of improving technology in developing nations from America, European Union and several different territories over a 5-year period starting from 2006.

The most striking features are the upward trends of the investment from all the countries mentioned and the greatest amount of money that the USA spent during the time frame under study.

In 2006, the United States provided approximately 9.7 billion US dollars to support developing countries in terms of technology. Then, the financial investment from the USA experienced some noticeable increases in 2 years later and reached its peak of about 22.7 billion US dollars in 2010. The budget spent on enhancing area of technology specialisation from EU and other countries was far lower than the one from America, approximately 3.3 billion US dollar from the former and about 2.7 billion US dollars from the latter in 2006. Although there were several fluatuations of these trends between 2006 and 2010, they peaked at their highest points, 4.0 billions US dollars for EU countries and 3.3 billion US dollars for the others in the final year of the period under study.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-22 wardiati 78 view
2019-10-15 khoavodoj 78 view
2019-10-08 koinoyokan 84 view
2019-08-28 oxfordpro111 78 view
2019-08-10 JennieD 67 view
Essays by user CyborgTheBest :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...ations from America, European Union and several different territories over a 5-year period starti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 992.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66680907823 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.7918120636 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.333333333 112.824112599 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232550239784 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124427319043 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378853179221 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14723810811 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342674093421 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.2329268293 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.3 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.