Task 1: The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010.
The table illustrates the amount of donations made by the US, UK and other countries in order to support technological development in developing countries between 2006 and 2010.
Overall, it is noticeable from the table that there was an upward trend in the amount of money by charities throughout the five-year period. Additionally, the money donated by the US charities was by far highest.
The total amount of money given by all charities saw a dramatic increase from 15.7 billion of US dollars in 2006 to 24.3 billion in 2009. The number continued to rise sharply to 30 billion dollars in the following year, the highest number recorded in the table. The US charities contributed 9.7 billion in 2006, half of the total amount of money and the figure then climbed steadily to reach its peak at 22.7 billion in 2010.
At the beginning of the given period, in EU, countries gave charities from 3.3 billion in 2006 and the aid slowly grew to 3.1 billion in 2008. The figure then dropped slightly by half a billion to 2.6 billion in 2009 and in the following year, the money was at a record of 4 billion dollars. Meanwhile, charities in other countries also provided increasing aid. Despite a similar fluctuation to EU charities in the amount given each year, donations went up from $2.7 billion in 2006 to reach $3.3 billion in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | wardiati | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | khoavodoj | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | koinoyokan | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-28 | oxfordpro111 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | JennieD | 67 | view |
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full-time and part-time students about its services of IT support and current opening hours. 67
- Some people think that children should receive formal training at school on how to be good parents in the future Do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Noise pollution in cities and rural areas 67
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e highest number recorded in the table. The US charities contributed 9.7 billion in...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1102.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72961373391 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64928916441 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472103004292 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8025146994 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.2 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420892603333 0.215688989381 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191714281756 0.103423049105 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123111037087 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285216281224 0.15604864568 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10737256899 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.