The table shows the amount of money given to developing countries by the USA, EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010.
The given table illustrates the financial assistance provided to developing nations by the USA, EU countries and other nations between 2006 and 2010.
In general, it is clear that the year 2006 witnessed the lowest level of monetary assistance from the USA, Europe countries, and others, while 2010 marked the lion share amount of funds granted to support developing nations.
As can be seen from the graph, in 2006, USA became a dominating feature as this country assisted the most amount of money which was 9,8 million of dollars, whereas EU nations and different countries provided the financial support of 3,1 and 2,8 million of dollars respectively. However, in 2010, it is evident that USA’s financial support remained to tie at the first place, which was roughly twice as high as that of year 2006, 20.3 millions of dollars compared to 9.8 millions of dollars. Regarding EU and other countries during 2010, both nations had a slight leap frog of average 0.95 millions of dollars, which was 4,1 and 3.7 respectively. Lastly, the 15,7 millions of dollar supporting developing countries in 2006 was much roughly two times lower than that of in 2010 which was also aided to the emerging nations (28,1 million of dollars)
From 2007 and 2008, the group of three countries experienced a considerable upward trend in the total amount of money given to developing countries. To be specific, USA witnessed an estimated double increase in millions of dollars from 11 up to 17. This was followed by EU countries and other nations, both of them were not very popular with a marginal rise of 0,5 and 0,3 millions dollar each. However, during 2009, it can be seen the the monetary support from them dropped sizably. USA declined 17 millions of dollar to 16,7, EU countries decreased 0,3 of their financial support to developing countries, which had also a similar amount of reduction comparing other countries (3,2). If the reduction of monetary assistance from USA, EU member states and additional countries were added up, the total millions of dollars went through a reduction as well, 24,4 in comparison to 23,5.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-30 | Dangdang | 67 | view |
| 2022-09-07 | Drake004 | 84 | view |
| 2021-03-21 | Narges.s | 84 | view |
| 2020-02-22 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-24 | angela_nancy | 67 | view |
- Some people think that business subjects should be mandatory in high school education To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In recent years the structure of a family and the role of its members are gradually changing What kinds of changes can occur Do you think these changes are positive and negative 56
- The growth of online shopping will one day lead to all shops in towns and cities closing Do you agree or disagree 61
- The graph shows information about the number of people in Australia who use Chinese Arabic Italian and Greek as their first language 73
- TA 6 CC 7 LR 6 GRA 7 Overall 6 5 11
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d other nations between 2006 and 2010. In general, it is clear that the year 20...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...granted to support developing nations. As can be seen from the graph, in 2006, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '3 million'.
Suggestion: 3 million
... twice as high as that of year 2006, 20.3 millions of dollars compared to 9.8 millions of dol...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '8 million'.
Suggestion: 8 million
... 20.3 millions of dollars compared to 9.8 millions of dollars. Regarding EU and other countri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 595, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '95 million'.
Suggestion: 95 million
...ons had a slight leap frog of average 0.95 millions of dollars, which was 4,1 and 3.7 respecti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 670, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '7 million'.
Suggestion: 7 million
...,1 and 3.7 respectively. Lastly, the 15,7 millions of dollar supporting developing countries ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erging nations 28,1 million of dollars From 2007 and 2008, the group of three c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 442, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...h. However, during 2009, it can be seen the the monetary support from them dropped siza...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 442, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...h. However, during 2009, it can be seen the the monetary support from them dropped siza...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 507, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '17 million'.
Suggestion: 17 million
...from them dropped sizably. USA declined 17 millions of dollar to 16,7, EU countries decreased ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, lastly, regarding, so, well, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 33.7804878049 178% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 965.302439024 182% => OK
No of words: 353.0 196.424390244 180% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98583569405 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 3.73543355544 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62772575826 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 106.607317073 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475920679887 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 500.4 283.868780488 176% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.4614826383 43.030603864 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.0 112.824112599 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0909090909 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435668421829 0.215688989381 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197872529162 0.103423049105 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118948251954 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302500544515 0.15604864568 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103211283815 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.2329268293 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d other nations between 2006 and 2010. In general, it is clear that the year 20...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...granted to support developing nations. As can be seen from the graph, in 2006, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '3 million'.
Suggestion: 3 million
... twice as high as that of year 2006, 20.3 millions of dollars compared to 9.8 millions of dol...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '8 million'.
Suggestion: 8 million
... 20.3 millions of dollars compared to 9.8 millions of dollars. Regarding EU and other countri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 595, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '95 million'.
Suggestion: 95 million
...ons had a slight leap frog of average 0.95 millions of dollars, which was 4,1 and 3.7 respecti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 670, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '7 million'.
Suggestion: 7 million
...,1 and 3.7 respectively. Lastly, the 15,7 millions of dollar supporting developing countries ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erging nations 28,1 million of dollars From 2007 and 2008, the group of three c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 442, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...h. However, during 2009, it can be seen the the monetary support from them dropped siza...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 442, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...h. However, during 2009, it can be seen the the monetary support from them dropped siza...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 507, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '17 million'.
Suggestion: 17 million
...from them dropped sizably. USA declined 17 millions of dollar to 16,7, EU countries decreased ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, lastly, regarding, so, well, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 33.7804878049 178% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 965.302439024 182% => OK
No of words: 353.0 196.424390244 180% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98583569405 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 3.73543355544 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62772575826 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 106.607317073 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475920679887 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 500.4 283.868780488 176% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.4614826383 43.030603864 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.0 112.824112599 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0909090909 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435668421829 0.215688989381 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197872529162 0.103423049105 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118948251954 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302500544515 0.15604864568 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103211283815 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.2329268293 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.