The table shows the expenditure on various types of food in one European country in 1992, 2002 and 2012.
The supplied table compares how much money Italian inhabitants spent on distinct classifications of food and drinks in the years 1992, 2002, and 2012.
Overall, there is an upward trend in the expenditure of beef, chicken, potatoes, as opposed to the decreasing budget of butter over a period of 2 decades.
It is conspicuous that each expense of protein clusters approximately quadrupling other assemblages rocketed after 20 years, particularly the 9 million euros and 18 million euro rise of the pays for the beef and the chicken respectively. With the same pattern of mentioned formers, the purchase that Italian residents made for the potatoes lightly surged from 11 million euros in 1992 to 18 million euros in 2012.
In contrast, Italy witnessed the drop in the expenditure on coffee which is recorded at 9 million euros then decreased and stably stood at 7 million euros for a decade. Having fluctuated with the moderately different changes in an amount of money, the spending on milk uplifted to 14 million euros after the fall at 10 million euros in 2012, compared to the return at 8 million euros of the purchase of butter sort in the years of 2012 like its record 20 years ago.
To sum up, Italian citizens tended to pay more money on protein and carbohydrate foods rather than drinks and the dairy category.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, in contrast, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89333333333 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75266515074 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591111111111 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.3901251542 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.285714286 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1428571429 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105600548291 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604760778015 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653285858341 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0741166449511 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705243608256 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.