Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is true that many people cite that economic advancement is the solitary solution for the termination of starvation and hardship. However, I totally embrace the idea that the environment is excessively devastated by economic development
It is tolerable that there are voluminous claims which quote that economic improvement is the sole cure for adversity issues like poor circumstances. Particularly, when the economy is strengthened, the authorities will pour the national budget to set a clutch of social welfare policies that can provide funding for difficulties. However, unfortunately, the state of corrupt officials who intentionally and deceptively withdraw the internal funds such as taxes or even charity to enrich themselves still exists and happens unrestrainedly. Hence, this issue just establishes political crises and recessions which could explicitly impoverish the economy.
On the other hand, there is a great bunch of evidence proving how abhorrently economic growth is demolishing the environment. Apparently, developing a nation accompanies the increase of buildings and facilities, therefore, more and more natural lowlands or forests must be cleared in order to construct the artificial architectures as well as use for cultivation. Furthermore, manufacturing an extensive amount of non-biodegradable productions could lead to the rise of garbage emitted by human beings, the Earth residents could sustain a bunch of catastrophes stemming from what they have done.
To sum up, economic growth is unfeasibly stopped by the virtue of social progression and the survival of humans. Besides the negative impacts caused by the evolution of the natural environments, brutal factors involved by the rapacious bureaucracy do not enhance the living quality for the poor but worsen the general attempts contributed by individuals.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, still, then, therefore, well, such as, as well as, it is true, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75547445255 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3453698272 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675182481752 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.4151603805 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.7 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.4 7.06120827912 218% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12830135906 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512620131759 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059734346747 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0776344739453 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036757535241 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.69 50.2224549098 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 11.3001002004 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.08 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, still, then, therefore, well, such as, as well as, it is true, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75547445255 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3453698272 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675182481752 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.4151603805 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.7 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.4 7.06120827912 218% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12830135906 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512620131759 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059734346747 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0776344739453 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036757535241 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.69 50.2224549098 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 11.3001002004 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.08 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.