The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 – 2010.
The supplied line chart depicts how many international conferences were hosted in three capital cities from 1980 to 2010.
Overall, both city A and city B witnessed a downward trend in the number of international conferences, as opposed to the upward trend recorded in city C over the period.
As can be seen clearly from the chart, having the same pattern but the different beginning, city A operated 35 international conferences, then this number dropped to over 30 after the first ten years. With the same period of time, the data noted for city B was 30 in 1980 before declining to approximately 25 in 1990. In the next two decades, the figure for international conferences held in each city A and B fluctuated from 24 to 28.
In 1980, there was no international conference run in city A. However, this data constantly rocketed to 20 in 1990, thus it kept climbing to reach the top at 35 after a decade. Ten years later, although the number marked in city C was still higher than the remains, it slightly decreased to about 30 in 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...fter the first ten years. With the same period of time, the data noted for city B was 30 in 19...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, still, then, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64864864865 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85145254079 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5192727735 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3211307166 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152314347349 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113924110237 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213170805236 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0899957365507 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.