The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The table gives information related to the forested land in six areas in the world in three different years measured in millions of hectares.
Firstly, the forest-clad land in Oceania, Africa, and South America experienced a steady decrease over the period of time. In detail, the forest area in Oceania dropped from 199 million hectares in 1990 to 197 million hectares in 2000 before falling to the lowest number at 709 million hectares in 2005. Similarly, the number of wooden land in Africa and South America reduced from 749 million hectares and 946 million hectares in 1990 to 691 million hectares and 882 million hectares in 2005, respectively.
Secondly, regarding the three remaining areas, the number of forest areas in Asia experienced the most significant increase after fifteen years, from 576 million hectares in 1990 to 584 million hectares in 2005. Moreover, the number of forest-clad land in Europe increased slightly from 989 million hectares in 1990 to 998 million hectares in 2000 and reached the top at 1001 million hectares in 2005. Finally, after decreasing three million hectares from 708 million hectares in 1990 to 705 million hectares in 2000, the figures for forested land in North America remained unchanged in the last tracking years.
In conclusion, Europe and Oceania remained the areas that had the most and the least forested land, correspondingly.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 108, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... experienced a steady decrease over the period of time. In detail, the forest area in Oceania ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, similarly, so, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1161.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18303571429 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64197846759 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459821428571 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.7387312655 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.125 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.23603664747 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27193598305 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158228324238 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623842416134 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189012756333 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695349363785 0.0819641961636 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.