The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The chart illustrates data regarding forested land measured by millions of hectares in multiple regions of the globe. Overall, after the course of 15 years, there was a slight expansion in the forest area in Asia and Europe, whilst the opposite trend was observed in the remained regions. Moreover, European countries always had the largest forest area when compared to the rest.
In 1990, Asian countries had 576 million of hectares of forest area. This figure slightly dropped to 570 million in 2000 and significantly rose to 584 millions after 5 years. Meanwhile, there was an observable surge over the period of 15 years in Europe, starting at 989 millions hectares in 1990 and reaching 1001 millions in 2005.
On the other hand, African region lost their forest area dramatically. They used to have 749 millions of hectares in 1990 but this number declined steeply to 691 millions in 2005. There was a slight decrease in forested land in North America from 708 millions of hectares to 705 million and this statistic remained unchanged for the next 5 years. The same trend applied to Oceania. South America suffered the greatest loss of forest area. After 15 years from 1990, the forest area in this region was measured at 882 millions of hectares, significantly smaller than its figure in 1990 (946 millions of hectares).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-06 | hyst12 | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | thomasneverseen | view | |
| 2022-11-02 | phuongnguyen1234 | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-02 | phuongnguyen1234 | view | |
| 2022-11-02 | phuongnguyen1234 | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The chart illustrates data regarding for...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orest area when compared to the rest. In 1990, Asian countries had 576 million...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0 and reaching 1001 millions in 2005. On the other hand, African region lost t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '749 million'.
Suggestion: 749 million
...st area dramatically. They used to have 749 millions of hectares in 1990 but this number declin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '708 million'.
Suggestion: 708 million
... in forested land in North America from 708 millions of hectares to 705 million and this statis...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 517, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '882 million'.
Suggestion: 882 million
...est area in this region was measured at 882 millions of hectares, significantly smaller than it...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 589, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '946 million'.
Suggestion: 946 million
...icantly smaller than its figure in 1990 946 millions of hectares.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, regarding, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95964125561 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53052311311 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529147982063 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.7094537997 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1666666667 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5833333333 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160635927428 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704800901113 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442458250582 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122766171258 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253597034539 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.