The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The table illustrates the number of hectares of forested land in 6 continents of the world
Overall, Europe had the largest land constituted in 2005, while Oceania's forested land registed the number in 2000. Moreover, Europe was also recorded nearly double figures compared to Asia. A lower number of forested land compared to Europe was seen to make by South America.
It is clear that throughout the period from 1990 to 2005, Africa was witnessed a remarkable decline, from 749 in 1990 to 691 in 2005. By contrast, the figure for Europe is given a skyrocketed from 989 hectares in 1990 to 1001 hectares in 2005. In addition, Oceania had a steadily decrease and reached a bottom of 197 hectares in 2005.
On the other hand, there is a fluctuation in the number of Asia and finally rose to 584 hectares by 2005. In contrast, there was a gradually decline to 705 hectares by 2005 in North America. South America had suffered a significant drop, from 946 by 1990 to just 882 by 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-08 | hien3112 | 75 | view |
| 2023-03-06 | hyst12 | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | thomasneverseen | view | |
| 2022-11-02 | phuongnguyen1234 | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-02 | phuongnguyen1234 | view |
- In the past most people lived in small villages where everyone knew everyone else Nowadays most people live in large cities where they only know a few people in their area What do you think were advantages and disadvantages of living in a small cities 73
- In many parts of the world children and teenagers are spending more and more of their time indoors What do you think are the causes of this problem What measures could best be taken to solve it 61
- The diagrams below show two methods of using water to produce electricity 82
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0 to 1001 hectares in 2005. In addition, Oceania had a steadily decrease and reac...
^^
Line 5, column 271, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('steadily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...ares in 2005. In addition, Oceania had a steadily decrease and reached a bottom of 197 hectares in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('gradually') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decline') instead of another adjective.
...ectares by 2005. In contrast, there was a gradually decline to 705 hectares by 2005 in North Americ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, moreover, so, while, as for, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69540229885 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59610494139 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3863421838 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7777777778 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1111111111 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100655390848 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462222089303 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518021073063 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930511574872 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074904510168 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0 to 1001 hectares in 2005. In addition, Oceania had a steadily decrease and reac...
^^
Line 5, column 271, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('steadily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...ares in 2005. In addition, Oceania had a steadily decrease and reached a bottom of 197 hectares in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('gradually') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decline') instead of another adjective.
...ectares by 2005. In contrast, there was a gradually decline to 705 hectares by 2005 in North Americ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, moreover, so, while, as for, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69540229885 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59610494139 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3863421838 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7777777778 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1111111111 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100655390848 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462222089303 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518021073063 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930511574872 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074904510168 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.