The line chart elucidates the quantity of waste manufactured of three companies A, B, C among the year 2000 and 2015.
Overall, the period had witnessed a noticeable drop in the amount of waste produced of company A and B, however, the tendency of the figure of waste demonstrated by company C is negatively correlated.
As a deep analysis of the chart disclosure, it is indisputable that on the first half decade, the number of waste fabricated by company A experienced a slight lull from 12 to 10 tons before having a moderate decline to under 9 tons in 2015. The propensity of the amount of waste produced by company B had a similar fashion with company A on the last decade from 2005 to 2015, after having a significant fall from the high point of 10 tons to 3 tons, it saw a modest growth of 1 tons, from 9 tons to 10 tons.
Turning into more detail, the reverse was true for the production of waste by company C, it increased markedly from over 3 tons to 6 tons among 5 year then it saw a appreciable acceleration to over 9 tons in 2015.
- The graph below shows the amount of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 73
- The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 Link table https drive google com file d 1bN1Kakm812OcI3ntl5QQlne RNQC5d M view 73
- The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 Link table https drive google com file d 1bN1Kakm812OcI3ntl5QQlne RNQC5d M view
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901 20
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 164, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...tons to 6 tons among 5 year then it saw a appreciable acceleration to over 9 tons...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.36224489796 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76827444423 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525510204082 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.5070292138 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.0 112.824112599 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.2 22.9334400587 171% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264823168826 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16065715312 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076264459557 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185197550283 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644813594996 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.1 10.3012195122 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.6 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.4329268293 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.