The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901.
The chart illustrates how many male, female workers and factories produced silk in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901.
Overall, there was a decrease in the total number of employees due to the declines of workers in both genders throughout the period. In contrast, while the number of employees producing silk got lesser, the quantity of factories increased sharply.
The number of male workers started at 53964 people, after which it saw a gradual decline to 13375 employees in 1901. Similar changes, but with much greater number, the figures for females working in the silk factories drop continuously from 76786 to over 25000 in the 50-year period.
130750 people had the job of making silk in the first year, followed by a significant decrease to near 39000 in the year 1901, due to the drop of workers in both genders. However, the quantity of factories built for producing silk experienced a fluctuation, which increased considerably to over 700 before declining to 623 in the last year.
- The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption 73
- The graph and the table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph and chart below give information on the average daily maximum and minimum temperatures in degrees Celsius and the average number of days with rainfall each month for two Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the 89
- Many people use written language in a less formal way and in a relaxed way than in the past Why is that so Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages 73
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98203592814 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63840244947 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580838323353 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.4039140387 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 118.857142857 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333981242562 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160317397952 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100068295385 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220756654776 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0886042130576 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.