The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901.
The table illustrates the production of silk by the industries and the employees of both genders in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901.
Overall, the main employees of silk productions are females though, the total numbers of employees were decreased and industrial output was escalated over the 60 years.
From the beginning of the table, there were only 272 factories employed with 130.750 members for works. However,after ten years the number of factories increased to 761 but, the employees count were decreased to 109.869. For the following year's the silk production by the factories were declined, even though it reached to 702 in 1981 with 67.904 workers. Whereas, for the next 20 years there were a considerable drop in silk industry such as 663 factories in 1991 with 49.925 employees and 623 with a mere 38.942 respectively at the end of the given period.
Similarly, the number of employees also has a gradual decrease like, men are 53.964 and females are 76.784 in 1981 which plummeted to 38.102 and 53.310 by 1871. Furthermore, the counts of male and female workers were again dipped significantly at the end of the period with only 13.375 males and 25.567females respectively.
- The maps below show a science park in 2008 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In the future it seems it will be more difficult to live on the earth Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live such as Mars To what extend do you agree with this statement 57
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns? 78
- The chart below gives information on the numbers of workers in different occupations who migrated to Australia between 2009 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology canreplace their functions.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, may, second, similarly, so, whereas, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91625615764 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50087223009 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56157635468 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.3773055047 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.7272727273 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194927105988 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712332479681 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397045184181 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112450490395 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036756548066 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, may, second, similarly, so, whereas, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91625615764 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50087223009 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56157635468 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.3773055047 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.7272727273 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194927105988 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712332479681 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397045184181 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112450490395 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036756548066 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.