The table shows the number of international tourist arrivals (in thousands) in various countries in 2009 and 2010, together with the percentage change in these numbers.
The table compares the numbers and the percentage change of international tourists who arrived in 9 countries over a 2-year period. Overall, there was a rise in the number of international tourist arrivals in most countries, with the highest percentage increase in Germany.
In 2009 and 2010, 76,000 international tourists visited France, compared with figures of 66,000 who visited the USA in 2009, rising to 67,000 in 2010. These numbers were significantly higher than tourist arrivals in Spain and the UK. Both of these countries received 55,000 international visitors in 2009, increasing to 56,000 and 57,000 respectively in the following year.
There was also a slight rise in the figures for Italy, from 44,000 in 2009 to 45,000 in 2010. However, although the numbers were lower, international tourist arrivals in Turkey, China and Germany all rose markedly over this period. In contrast, the figures for Hong Kong fell by 1,000 to 9,000 between these years.
All the countries experienced a rise in the percentage of international tourist arrivals, except for France, where there was no change, and Hong Kong where the figures show a decline of 11% between the two years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-30 | Lê Thị Thanh Tâm | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-30 | Lê Thị Thanh Tâm | 61 | view |
| 2021-12-30 | Lê Thị Thanh Tâm | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-07 | darciex_ng | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-04 | datnguyentienhnvn@gmail.com | 78 | view |
- The table details the international tourist arrivals in millions in 8 countries in 2009 and 2010 and the changes in percentages 73
- The table shows the number of international tourist arrivals in thousands in various countries in 2009 and 2010 together with the percentage change in these numbers 61
- The table shows the number of international tourist arrivals in thousands in various countries in 2009 and 2010 together with the percentage change in these numbers 67
- People living in large cites today face many problems in their everyday life What are these problems Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns 73
- Some people say that men are naturally more competitive than women To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, except for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24083769634 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81663714505 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51832460733 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5169515351 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.222222222 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371091940322 0.215688989381 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175174877385 0.103423049105 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110325173157 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242387933785 0.15604864568 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127151204131 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.