The table shows the number of international tourist arrivals in thousands in various countries in 2009 and 2010 together with the percentage change in these numbers

Essay topics:

The table shows the number of international tourist arrivals (in thousands) in various
countries in 2009 and 2010, together with the percentage change in these numbers.

The table illustrates how many international tourists arrived in different countries and the proportion change in these numbers between 2009 and 2010.

In general, France was the most favorite place for tourists but there was no change in the number of foreign tourists who traveled here while the highest percentage increase was in Germany.

In 2009 and 2010, the number of people who visited France was 76 thousand, compared with the figure for the USA was 66 thousand in 2009, rising to 67
thousand in 2010. This number was significantly higher than tourist arrivals in Spain and the UK. Both of these countries received 55 thousand international visitors by 2009 and experienced a slight increase to 56 and 57 thousand respectively in the following year.

There was also a growth in the number of foreign tourists traveling to the remaining countries except for Hong Kong. To be more specific, by 2009, there were 44 thousand people who visited Italy, rising to 45 thousand in the next year. Meanwhile, the numbers were rather lower, international tourists arrivals in Turkey, China, and Germany witnessed a considerable increase over this period. By contrast, the figure for Hong Kong declined from 10 to 9 thousand
between 2 years.

All these countries experienced sustainable growth over the period except for France, where there was no change, and Hong Kong where the figure decreased 11% between 2 years.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-12-30 Lê Thị Thanh Tâm 73 view
2021-12-30 Lê Thị Thanh Tâm 61 view
2021-12-30 Lê Thị Thanh Tâm 67 view
2021-11-07 darciex_ng 84 view
2021-10-04 datnguyentienhnvn@gmail.com 78 view
Essays by user Lê Thị Thanh Tâm :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, except for, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31413612565 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81663714505 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51832460733 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.782712198 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.777777778 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 16.0 3.83414634146 417% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371091940322 0.215688989381 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175174877385 0.103423049105 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110325173157 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137091445211 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125072082001 0.0819641961636 153% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.